Ceci n’est pas une preuve

Published: 12 March 2019

The use of trapdoor commitments in Bayer-Groth proofsand the implications for the verifiabilty of the Scytl-SwissPost Internet voting system

Authors

  • Sarah Jamie Lewis - Open Privacy Research Society
  • Olivier Pereira - UCLouvain – ICTeam, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • Vanessa Teague - The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

Abstract

The implementation of the commitment scheme in the SwissPost-Scytl mixnet uses a trapdoor commitment scheme, which allows an authority whoknows the trapdoor values to generate a shuffle proof transcript that passesverification but actually alters votes. We give two examples of details of howthis could be used.

The first example allows the first mix to use the trapdoors to substitute votes for which it knows the randomness used to generate theencrypted vote. The second example does not even require knowledge of therandom factors used to generate the votes, and could be used by the last mixin the sequence.

Note

Since the above abstract was written SwissPost & Scytl have confirmed our analysis, and the entire evoting program was suspended after we reported a 3rd critical flaw which impacted Individual Verifiability.

Full Text: https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/vjteague/UniversalVerifiabilitySwissPost.pdf

Fund Projects like Election Security


Donate via Cryptocurrencies

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Patreon

Become a Patron!

Donate via Paypal


Open Privacy is an incorporated non-profit society in British Columbia, Canada. Donations are not tax deductible. You can Donate Once via Bitcoin, Monero, Zcash, and Paypal, or you can Donate Monthly via Patreon or Paypal. Please contact us to arrange donation by other methods.

More About Ceci n’est pas une preuve